[Watchdogs] Bennie and Bud

CBMassmann at aol.com CBMassmann at aol.com
Tue Sep 2 20:36:11 CDT 2008



In a message dated 9/2/2008 5:12:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
davidf at prismnet.com writes:

 
What is in the  best interests of the members is to see justice brought to 
criminals who ran  this coop as their personal fiefdom for 30  years.

This is a statement of your opinion. If they are  convicted as criminals they 
will see the justice you and  I want.  When it comes to civil litigation, I 
suggest that we  defer to the Board and management.   (cbm)

What you and  others seem to so conveniently forget is none of these changes 
would even be  occurring if it wasn't for the  lawsuit.

I have not forgot.  The changes include new management  and a board with two 
out of three newly elected members who voted against your  position and in the 
best interest as they saw it.  (cbm)

Just wait  till we,the members, get the others seats and real control of OUR  
COOP.

I'll wait. Hopefully more everyday members will vote and  the board will be 
truly representative of the membership.  While waiting  I'll support what 
appears to be the good judgement of the new management and a  majority of the 
board.  Will you wait? (cbm)
 

When that  happens,these types of conversations will melt  away.

When the members get the other seats will your "conversations  melt away"  
(1) even if your slate isn't elected? and (2)  when  the majority of the board 
doesn't agree with you? (cbm)

We are not  ratepayers,we are members !!!!!

We are both - and most of us are interested in rates we pay  and the contin
uing of excellent service levels. I'll leave justice to God and  the courts. 
(cbm)

David E. Friedman
TAG Polymers 
P.O. Box 711
Burnet,Tx.  78611
512-756-4633
512-219-4007 fax
512-423-7824 cell
_www.tagpolymers.com_ (http://www.tagpolymers.com/) 

----- Original Message ----- 
From:  _CBMassmann at aol.com_ (mailto:CBMassmann at aol.com)  
To: _mlmoden at texas-skies.com_ (mailto:mlmoden at texas-skies.com)  
Cc: _juan.garza at peci.com_ (mailto:juan.garza at peci.com)  ; 
_watchdogs at pec4u.org_ (mailto:watchdogs at pec4u.org)  ; _troy.fraser at senate.state.tx.us_ 
(mailto:troy.fraser at senate.state.tx.us)   ; _patrick.rose at house.state.tx.us_ 
(mailto:patrick.rose at house.state.tx.us)   
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 4:30  PM
Subject: Re: [Watchdogs] Bennie and  Bud


I would suggest that we give the new management, the board and law  
enforcement a chance.  If civil litigation is the only option available  and it is in 
the best interest of the ratepayers as  determined by management and a properly 
elected board, I  would support it.  I do not support the notion of civil 
litigation  to get even with someone even if it is a hollow victory for the 
ratepayers,  management and employees of the COOP. 
c b massmann
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/2/2008 3:43:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
_mlmoden at texas-skies.com_ (mailto:mlmoden at texas-skies.com)   writes:

Mr.  Massman:

We trusted the previous Board, previous management and law  enforcement 
to do their jobs for several decades. What did that get  us?

What violations of the Texas Penal Code will be found by the  various 
investigations?  Playing fast and loose with the  ratepayers money under 
the authority granted by the Board bylaws may  not be prosecutable.  If 
civil litigation is the only option  available to us to get justice, will 
you still oppose its  use?

Thanks.

Mr. Merle L. Moden

CBMassmann at aol.com  wrote:
> Most rate payers did not vote in the last board election  and don't 
> attend board meetings.  They trust the board,  management and law 
> enforcement to do their jobs. Rate payers are  primarily interested in 
> electricity service and its costs. Why  don't you let the board, 
> management and law enforcement do their  jobs? 
>  
> I am not in favor of law breakers not being  punished.  If former 
> management is found guilty of breaking  the law by a jury trial  they 
> will not get off "scot-  free".  If civil litigation drags out it will 
> costs  ratepayers both in the costs of the litigation and  the 
>  diversion of management and the board from the primary functions of  
> the COOP. Management and the majority of the board have set forth  good 
> reasons for their position and they have standing.  I  believe they 
> should be supported!
>  
> In a  message dated 8/27/2008 10:13:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
>  mlmoden at texas-skies.com writes:
>
>     Mr.  Massman:
>
>     On what basis do you assume  that most ratepayers support letting the
>      scoundrels off scot-free?
>
>      Thanks.
>
>     Mr. Merle L.  Moden
>
>
>     CBMassmann at aol.com  wrote:
>     > 
>     >  *_All very one sided!_*  Why no quote of Mr. Garza's  statement
>     as to
>     >  why he has taken his position on the settlement.  Are there  no
>     > benefits in accepting the settlement  for the PEC rate payers and
>     >  employees?  WE LIVE IN A GREAT COUNTRY WHERE THE FEW CAN BE HEARD  -
>     > but they need to remember they are THE  FEW and should be
>     considerate
>   > of THE MOST (rate payers and employees).
>   > 
>     > In a message dated  8/19/2008 8:25:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>      > mhawkins at tstar.net writes:
>      >
>     >      Friends,
>     >
>      >                 I’m  copying below a comment I just posted on the
>      >     Austin American-Statesman web site below the story  running this
>     >     morning  about the Board and Texland.  Check the site for a
>   number
>     >     of  other reader reactions:
>     >
>   >    
>      http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/0
8/19/0819pec.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=52
>   >    
>      
<http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/08/19/0819pec.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=52>
>   >
>     >      
>     >
>     >   Milton
>     >     
>      
<http://www.statesman.com/sitelife/content/sitelife/persona.html?newspaperUserId=1582414&plckUserId=1582414>
>   >     wrote:
>      >
>     >     Let's not forget  that Bennie and Bud didn't run PEC all by
>      >     themselves. In addition to a willing and compliant  Board of
>     >     Directors,  they were aided by two assistant general
>      managers, one
>     >     of whom  stills holds that position at PEC.
>      >
>     >     Last year,  according to PEC's filed Form 990's, one assistant
>   >     general manager received $274,640 in  compensation, including a
>     >   Christmas bonus from Bennie of $18,750; the other  received
>     >     $247,978 in  compensation, including a Christmas bonus from
>      Bennie
>     >     of $17,850. In  addition, one received $26,118 in
>     contributions  to
>     >     employee benefit  plans; the other received $27,112 in
>     >   contributions to employee benefit plans.
>   >
>     >     Has  anyone thought to ask the current employee and the former
>   >     employee two important questions:  What did you know? and
>     When did
>   >     you know it?
>   >
>     >     And  if the answers come back, "I didn't know anything," doesn't
>   >     that sound just like something Bud  Burnett said in his
>     deposition?
>   >     In their top, well-paid management  positions, they either
>     knew or
>   >     should have known.
>   >
>     >     If we  can stop Mr. Garza's (the Board majority's) efforts to
>   kill
>     >     the  Hall appeal of the judgment in the case, we might have a
>   >     chance to reform the settlement  agreement, stripping out the
>     >   immunity from civil actions the settlement provides  Bennie
>     and Bud
>      >     and all the rest, including the defendant  directors and their
>     >      attorneys and advisors.
>     >
>   >     In addition, the current assistant  general manager who
>     worked with
>   >     Bennie should be shown the door,  regardless of her level of
>     >   knowledge, and then held accountable for any culpable acts  or
>     >     failures to act on  her part.
>     >
>      >     8/19/2008 8:12 AM CDT
>      >
>     >     
>   >
>     >      
>     >
>     >   Milton Hawkins    mhawkins at tstar.net
>   >      <mailto:mhawkins at tstar.net>      830-868-9075
>     >
>      >     
>     >
>   >
>     >
>   >      _______________________________________________
>      >     Watchdogs mailing list
>      >     Watchdogs at pec4u.org
>      >      http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
>      >     NEW INSTRUCTIONS: To remove yourself from this  list, please send
>     >     an  email to watchdogs-request at pec4u.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the
>   >     SUBJECT line. Or go to
>   http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
>   >     and follow the instructions at the  bottom of the page.
>     >
>   >
>     >
>   >
>     >
>    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   > It's only a deal if it's where /you/ want to go. Find  your
>     travel deal
>      > *here*
>     >  <http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047>.
>   >
>      
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   >
>     >  _______________________________________________
>      > Watchdogs mailing list
>     >  Watchdogs at pec4u.org
>     >  http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
>      > NEW INSTRUCTIONS: To remove yourself from this list, please  send
>     an email to watchdogs-request at pec4u.org  with UNSUBSCRIBE in the
>     SUBJECT line. Or go to  http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
>      > and follow the instructions at the bottom of the page.
>   _______________________________________________
>   Watchdogs mailing list
>      Watchdogs at pec4u.org
>      http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
>     NEW  INSTRUCTIONS: To remove yourself from this list, please send
>   an email to watchdogs-request at pec4u.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in  the
>     SUBJECT line. Or go to  http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
>     and  follow the instructions at the bottom of the page.  
>
>
>
>
> It's only a deal if it's where  /you/ want to go. Find your travel deal 
> *here* 
>  <http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047>.






 
____________________________________
 It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal  _here_ 
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047) .
 
____________________________________
_______________________________________________
Watchdogs mailing  list
Watchdogs at pec4u.org
http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
NEW  INSTRUCTIONS: To remove yourself from this list, please send an email to 
 watchdogs-request at pec4u.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the SUBJECT line. Or go to  
http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
and follow the instructions  at the bottom of the page.




**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.      
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://103.greenbuilder.com/pipermail/watchdogs/attachments/20080902/1c57836e/attachment.html>


More information about the Watchdogs mailing list