[Watchdogs] testimony
CBMassmann at aol.com
CBMassmann at aol.com
Wed Apr 8 20:30:28 CDT 2009
She will get mine.
In a message dated 4/8/2009 6:05:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
davidf at prismnet.com writes:
won't get my vote again
----- Original Message -----
From: _Linda Kaye Rogers_ (mailto:rogers-pec7 at live.com)
To: _pec4u Watchdogs_ (mailto:watchdogs at pec4u.org)
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:29 PM
Subject: [Watchdogs] testimony
I am only too happy to share why I tesified against the Fraser/Rose Bills.
First and formost , I was exerting my rights and priviledges as an American
citizen, that particular special right of freedom of speech. For me, as a
member of PEC, and as an American, it was a thrill to participate in the
democratic process. I am very disturbed that Milton and Christi Clements seem to
believe that right is extended only to those who agree with thier point of
view.
Second, if anyone feels they must report my activities, I would ask that
they get all the information correct. One, is that the Swinford Bill is the
Swinford Bill, not the TEC/Swinford Bill. But I believe an astute individual
might ask why the TEC, and at least 20 other Texas Electric Cooperative
representatives were present yesterday, all opposing the Fraser/Rose bills and
suppporting the Swinford Bill. If the Fraser/Rose bills are so good for
cooperatives, why are they opposing it? In the House, it was recognized by the
members that the Rose Bill is a punitive action directed at the PEC. However, it
effects all co-ops.
So we come to the second portion of misinformation. Rep. Rose mentioned
that when he was in Washington about all the PEC troubles, he told them that we
didn't need Washingotn to fix things in Texas. I hold the same belief: we
don't need the Legislature to fix our co-op. We are doing a good job
ourselves, thank you very much. And this was part of my testimony. I would prefer to
see NO interference by government. THe fear that is being used to keep the
pot stirred, is that we have no way of insuring that our reforms, especially
the election process, won't go back to the way it was. THis can be done by
an amendment to the by-law regarding the election process. Amending to "no
changes without full disclosure of intent to members, member support of such
action and unanimous board vote" could remedy this problem. (This is of
course, a simplified/condensed example).
My presence at the legislature was to support Mr Garza in discharging his
duty as directed by 6/7ths of the Board. I stated that support, reiterated my
non-support of the Rose bill, and a statement that I felt the Swinford Bil
needed additional revision, but that as a member of the PEC, I would support
the decision made by the majority of my board. This may sound like some
contrdiction, but I believe the Representatives understood my message.
I respect Milton, Carlos, Patrick,John and Chrisit's rights to disagree with
me. I would appreciate the same courtesy. Lack of disagreement, and
voicing of that disagreement, is a great part of what got us into this mess in the
first place. Allowing one group of people to set the course of action for
our cooperative feels like a very dangerous action to me. You can expect me to
continue to exert my freedome of speech, and the inate freedom of thought
that comes with that right.
Respectfully, Linda Kaye Rogers PEC Member
____________________________________
Quick access to your favorite MSN content and Windows Live with Internet
Explorer 8. _Download FREE now!_
(http://ie8.msn.com/microsoft/internet-explorer-8/en-us/ie8.aspx?ocid=B037MSN55C0701A)
____________________________________
_______________________________________________
Watchdogs mailing list
Watchdogs at pec4u.org
http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
NEW INSTRUCTIONS: To remove yourself from this list, please send an email to
watchdogs-request at pec4u.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the SUBJECT line. Or go to
http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
and follow the instructions at the bottom of the page.
_______________________________________________
Watchdogs mailing list
Watchdogs at pec4u.org
http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
NEW INSTRUCTIONS: To remove yourself from this list, please send an email to
watchdogs-request at pec4u.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the SUBJECT line. Or go to
http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
and follow the instructions at the bottom of the page.
**************New Deals on Dell Netbooks – Now starting at $299 (A
HREF=http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219939010x1201342897/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fa
d.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B213771626%3B35379597%3Bw)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://103.greenbuilder.com/pipermail/watchdogs/attachments/20090408/0f57038b/attachment.html>
More information about the Watchdogs
mailing list