[Watchdogs] Drama

Fri Feb 6 17:08:12 CST 2009

I totally agree with Mr. Mink.  Clyde Doyal

From: watchdogs-bounces at pec4u.org [mailto:watchdogs-bounces at pec4u.org] On
Behalf Of Douglas Mink
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 2:49 PM
To: Linda Kaye Rogers
Cc: watchdogs at pec4u.org
Subject: Re: [Watchdogs] Drama

Ms. Rogers,

Thanks for the 9 emails or so. Perhaps it's just as you wrote: "To expect
anything different was either pure stupidy or ignorance." 

Before your next email, perhaps you will take a moment to study up on the
concept of fiduciary duty. As Wikipedia states, a fiduciary duty is the
highest standard of care. A fiduciary is expected to be extremely loyal to
the person to whom he owes the duty: he must not put his personal interests
before the duty, and must not profit from his position as a fiduciary,
unless the principal consents. The 4 directors who didn't cooperate with
PEC's internal investigation, and who voted against the motion by Director
Cox, broke the cardinal rule of a fiduciary: Those 4 directors have
continually and blatantly put their personal and legal interests ahead of
their duty to PEC. Your rant against Director Cox for a supposed use of bad
judgment is, to put it mildly, highly illogical. With every new email you
send, I grow ever more thankful that you did not win election to the PEC
Board.   

Regards,

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Linda Kaye Rogers <rogers-pec7 at live.com>
wrote:

  _____  

  _____  

From: rogers-pec7 at live.com
To: watcdogs at pec4u.org
Subject: Drama
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:04:57 -0500

As a long-time professional trained in  assessment of human
behavior,communication, (including verbal and non-verbal), I am very
disappointed in Mr. Collin's report of the events at the meeting where Mr.
Cox proposed that Mr. Felps and Mr. Harmon step-down from their officer
positions.  Again, as a professional, I repeatedly say that your 
perception is your reality.  When one is completely biased and closed to
anything outside of their wants or beliefs, then TRUTH is very hard to
perceive.  My observation was that first of all, this whole thing was for
show and to give the media more "fodder" and Mr. Cox more "drama" upon which
to look good to the ones who have bought into all the media partial truths.
But more on that at another time.

I believe that for those who wish to have an open mind, you will view the
the video and see that Mr. Felps was very hurt by this move.  His emotion
was raw and painful, and  he said that he would try to move beyond that, but
would remember (the hurt).  A wise man once said....."to err is human, to
forgive, divine"  Few of us are reaching for divinity, but are just human.
I daresay that Mr. Collins, Mr. Cox, or YOU, the reader, cannot say that you
have not been hurt by someone, and that that hurt took a long-time to heal,
if ever.   You may have moved-on in the relationship, but the memory of the
pain lingered. The expectation that Mr. Felps be "divine" is pretty
unrealistic, by anyone's perception!   I saw no "glaring" or animosity, just
pain and embarrassment.  Those are very different emotions from anger and
hostility.  
Now, about Mr. Cox demonstrating rather poor judgement, from my perspective.
He KNEW this would not fly.  How could he not know---the four older
directors were put in a corner and of course they would unite.  To expect
anything different was either pure stupidy or ignorance. And I don't think
Mr. Cox is either one of these.  He also had other information that made it
clear this  is how the vote would go. So, why do it?  To make a show. To
further fuel the the fire of "old vs new".  I cannot think of any reason
other than these possibilities. If anyone really wants to have all the
facts, go back and review the many times there has been cohesive voting, or
when one of the older directors has voted against one of his/her fellow ,
purported "old guard" members.  True, not often, but it has happened. 

 For those of you who are unable to attend the meetings, please do not rely
on just the media, or the info that is presented in this chat forum.  There
is always more than one side to the coin.  As a member, I would really like
to see "less show and more work" at the meetings.  That's hard to do when
"drama" is high on the agenda.
PECoop member  Linda Kaye Rogers

  _____  

Windows LiveT: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. See how it
works.
<http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_022
009> 

  _____  

Windows LiveT: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. See how it
works.
<http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_022
009> 

  _____  

Windows LiveT: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. See how it
works.
<http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_022
009> 

_______________________________________________
Watchdogs mailing list
Watchdogs at pec4u.org
http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
NEW INSTRUCTIONS: To remove yourself from this list, please send an email to
watchdogs-request at pec4u.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the SUBJECT line. Or go to
http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
and follow the instructions at the bottom of the page. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://103.greenbuilder.com/pipermail/watchdogs/attachments/20090206/9ebb1c62/attachment.html>