[Watchdogs] Watchdogs Digest, Vol 19, Issue 5

[joesummy at moment.net]

Ed,

There are several links to support your view; here are three:

1. The refusal of the reform candidates to address continual election
reforms. Burying issues in committee for more study is an old political
tactic.

2. The lack of outrage by the supporters of the reform candidates
concerning the election reforms many wanted. There was plenty of outrage
when the shoe was on the other foot.

3. It appears the decisions are being made by the reform candidates before
the monthly meetings actually take place. There has already been more 4-3
votes then under the old guard, which never blocked any of the reforms,
and in fact, initiated the election reforms before the reform candidates
were elected.

What we have is just the same power consolidation that the reformers
criticized the old board.

Joe Summy
Johnson City



 In a message dated 11/5/2009 12:00:47 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> watchdogs-request at pec4u.org writes:
>
> There's  a short answer and a long answer to why PEC is instituting a
> costly means of  distributing capital credits this year.
> There's also a real answer to this.  It's the same answer as to  the
> question of why Social Security & VA recipients are NOT getting a COLA
> increase
> for the next two years, but are having individual $250 checks mailed  out
> to
> each of us.
>
> It's to buy the loyalty of those who are naive enough to be bought by
> those
>  established in power & doing everything they can to remain there.   Make
> no mistake as to the lengths they will go.
>
> Ed Gunter
> _______________________________________________
> Watchdogs mailing list
> Watchdogs at pec4u.org
> http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
> NEW INSTRUCTIONS: To remove yourself from this list, please send an email
> to watchdogs-request at pec4u.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the SUBJECT line. Or go
> to http://pec4u.org/mailman/listinfo/watchdogs
> and follow the instructions at the bottom of the page.